![]() The drawback of using the Arduino IDE, however, is that it lacks any means of configuring the programmable fabric (at the moment, at least-we're working on it!). The board duplicates the functionality of an Arduino Uno R3's various hardware peripherals on the pins, so many examples, libraries, and shields will work out of the box. We've ported the Arduino core to the PSoC5LP, so you can write code for the board in the standard Arduino IDE. We're going to discuss two different ways to tap the power of the PSoC. Conceptually, this fabric is similar to an FPGA or CPLD. In addition, the highly flexible fabric means that most any function can be routed to most any pin, which makes this a wonderful tool for development and allows board layout errors to be solved, at least temporarily, pretty easily. Wrapped around the processor is a rich analog and digital programmable fabric which can be configured to provide many functions which would otherwise need to be realized in code (lowering system performance) or external circuitry (adding cost and board size). The Compiler is extendabel in FORTH itself (generic and generative programming).The real power of the PSoC5LP isn't in the processor, however. ![]() The Kernel have integrated an interpreter and compiler. ![]() With this FORTH-pagage it is possible to test all C-applications interactively without debugger. The porting for the PSoC 6 is also planned. Mecrisp-Stellaris-FORTH is available for following Eva-Kits / PSoC`s : Locking for 'cy-terminal.s', you will find some assemblercode. See: > mecrisp-stellaris-2.4.5 for cy8c.zip If yes, the output of UART_ReadRxStatus() is an uint8 and the other are all single bit how is possible to make any operation between a single bit and a byte? UART_RX_STS_STOP_ERROR | UART_RX_STS_OVERRUN)) != 0u) If((rxStatus & (UART_RX_STS_BREAK | UART_RX_STS_PAR_ERROR | Why happen some errors if I want send just one byte.ģ) Using the code example i cant understand this: ![]() So I understood that is not enough to check only one bit in the RxDataRegister but I have to check also bit about error (Parity,stop,break.) but I cant understand the reason, If I want to send only the char C.why I have to check all these stuff, If( UART_TX_STS_FIFO_EMPTY!=0 & rxData!=0 )Ģ)Luckly I found on the code examples something really easier that 'UART-full duplex example'. To Odissey1 and user_347933176: actually I am not be able to manage that kind of code I'm studying right now pointers in C, so this kind of code is quite hard for me, maybe in 1 or 2 weeks it could be an interesting exercise.ġ)I followed Bob's advice about checking the if a byte was already received using if(UART_RX_STS_FIFO_NOTEMPTY=1) and it works fine but after this i used to send back data with UART_WriteTxData() checking on FIFO if empty and pn rxData, but without good results.It doesnt works because it seems the second if condition is never true. I hope not to bother you, if you could suggest me some material to improve my knowledge it could be great. Sorry for the mega post, I imagine they could be silly questions but I dont know where to find these informations, I know theory about RS232 protocol but to make it, it's really different.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |